Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1402

reference
559-tree-1
name
1402
tree-preservation-order

undefined

559-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028221 50.882234)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028164 50.882228,-1.028167 50.882239,-1.028174 50.882250,-1.028187 50.882258,-1.028203 50.882263,-1.028220 50.882265,-1.028238 50.882263,-1.028254 50.882258,-1.028266 50.882250,-1.028275 50.882240,-1.028278 50.882229,-1.028275 50.882218,-1.028267 50.882208,-1.028255 50.882200,-1.028239 50.882195,-1.028222 50.882193,-1.028204 50.882194,-1.028188 50.882199,-1.028175 50.882207,-1.028167 50.882217,-1.028164 50.882228)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL